There are, however, exceptions. I am often overtaken in fell races by someone who looks like they were designed based on a drawing done by a 5-year-old. Conversely, I very occasionally overtake someone who looks like a proper athlete.
So how good are you at spotting who is fast and who is not. Here is a collection of short videos showing club runners in the Kinder Downfall race. From my memory, these runners were not consecutively placed - so you have a fair spread of finishing times. I should also tell you that this is after about 8.5 miles, so the runners are probably quite tired now.
Can you place them in the correct order?
Runner A:
Runner B:
Runner C:
Runner D:
Runner E:
So how did you do? The answers are shown here. I'd be interested to hear how many you got right. Before anyone points it out, I realise it's hard to spot how much training someone has put in (ie, fitness).
I got this totally wrong. Totally. Good to see Runner A up and about, that is the guy that smashed his face up at Edale Skyline.
ReplyDeleteYes, it's hard isn't it. And yet the fastest of these five is about 2 minutes a mile faster than the slowest. You'd think that sort of difference would be very obvious. I didn't hear about that - it's good he's back running - I couldn't see any scars from where I was.
ReplyDeleteYes, it is hard. I was studying gait, build etc but there was no way of really telling. From what I understand, Runner A ran straight into a temporary ladder stile coming off Lose Hill, but face first. I passed him and there was a lot of blood and swelling. I saw him again at the finish and he couldn't open his eye it was so swollen!
ReplyDelete